« Leveson Principles underpinned in 133 words of legislation: no need for an extensive law | Main | Communications Data Bill and data retention: critical report on the cards »



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Re: >

I believe that 'in the public interest' means that publication is justified only if the benefit to the public outweighs the need for personal data protection.

Just because people are 'interested' does not mean that its publication is in the public interest...

The comments to this entry are closed.

All materials on this website are the copyright of Amberhawk Training Limited, except where otherwise stated. If you want to use the information on the blog, all we ask is that you do so in an attributable manner.