BrochuresCartoon

Amberhawk
COURSES (BCS/ISEB)
follow link for detail

Data Protection Training

Edinburgh: Foundation
3, 4 & 5 Oct

London: Practitioner
Starts Nov 13

FOI Training
London: Practitioner
Starts Oct 11

Information Security Management Training (CISMP)
London: Foundation
Starts Nov 27

Training/Update/Events
Update: Nov 20
GDPR: Sept 12 & Oct 6
PIA: Dec 12
DP Audit: Dec 14

Amberhawk

« National security agencies should be subject to Data Protection law. | Main | Protecting privacy and identity in the GOV.UK Verify scheme »

24/10/2014

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Is it worth mentioning that the Guernsey and Jersey DP Laws and the IoM’s DPA are all based on the UK’s Act mirror it almost word for word.

The EC considered the adequacy of the Islands’ statutes and deemed them all to be adequate. If the UK is going to have to account for its defective transposition of the Directive where does this leave the adequacy of the Crown Dependencies?

It’s going to be a bit difficult to argue the UK’s legislation is deficient but at the same time deem the Islands mirror copies to be adequate!

CP Comment: this reinforces my view that the UK DPA's problems are at the margin

The comments to this entry are closed.

All materials on this website are the copyright of Amberhawk Training Limited, except where otherwise stated. If you want to use the information on the blog, all we ask is that you do so in an attributable manner.