BrochuresCartoon

COURSES (ISEB/BCS)
follow link for detail

Data Protection Training

London
Starts Nov 17th

Leeds
Starts Oct. 15th

Edinburgh
Starts Nov 3rd

FOI Training
London
Starts Oct 23rd

Information Security Management Training (CISMP)
London
Starts Dec. 1st

Training/Update/Events
Update: October 27th
EU Regulation: Dec 16th
PIA: Dec 8th
DP Audit: Dec 9th

Amberhawk

« Spot the terrorist? Data protection and the seizure of personal data on laptops at airports. | Main | A “Jacobs” question: “should CESG be independent of GCHQ?” »

28/08/2013

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a0115709c6f9d970b019aff0c1b8d970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Does quashing the Scottish Borders Monetary Penalty mean a change to ICO enforcement policy?:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Can anyone explain why the data processors used by Scottish Borders local authorities for over 20 years, who dumped the files in a rubbish bin, have been protected from public identity throughout this entire saga? The ICO referred to them as "GS" in their penalty notice as did the written tribunal judgement. Three separate FOI requests to the council were all rejected on the grounds it was personal information and could not be revealed.My own FOI to the ICO also resulted in the information being withheld. Surely the data processor should have been fined/sanctioned then been named publicly.

The comments to this entry are closed.

All materials on this website are the copyright of Amberhawk Training Limited, except where otherwise stated. If you want to use the information on the blog, all we ask is that you do so in an attributable manner.