follow link for detail

Data Protection Training

Starts April 29th

Starts May 1st

Starts July 15th

FOI Training
Starts June 2nd

Information Security Management Training (CISMP)
Starts June 23rd

Update: May 12th
EU Regulation: April 9th
PIA: April 14th
DP Audit: April 15th


« Press reporting about Kate’s blagging overlooks data protection angle | Main | Seasonal greetings from all at Amberhawk »



TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Communications Data Bill and data retention: critical report on the cards:


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Perhaps the ICO comments are intended to be vague as this avoids rocking any boats?

I feel that the ICO sometimes gets confused. I was amused to read in its response to the consulation on the draft local audit bill praise for the transparency of the NFI when it itself found against my F of I request for an Audit Guide relating to one of the NFI exercises, and contested this through to a tribunal appeal, threatening me with costs, and only gave up when, at the suggestion of the judge, I made a repeat request with which the NFI complied, in two stages, with a little more prompting from the judge.

How the same organisation which said that interpretation of a data matching exercise output had to be kept secret can at the same time tell Parliament that the initiative is transparent beats me.

And see the consent order in F of I Appeal EA/2011/0008.

I owe eternal gratitude to Mr M Frankel without whom I might have had a nervous breakdown rather than win my case, especially when they started threatening costs.

Transparency my arse.

The comments to this entry are closed.

All materials on this website are the copyright of Amberhawk Training Limited, except where otherwise stated. If you want to use the information on the blog, all we ask is that you do so in an attributable manner.