BrochuresCartoon

COURSES (BCS/ISEB)
follow link for detail

Data Protection Training

London: Foundation
Sept 29,30,Oct 1

Leeds: Practitioner
Starts Oct. 13th

Edinburgh: Practitioner
Starts Nov 2nd

London: Practitioner
Starts Nov 16th

FOI Training
London: Practitioner
Starts Oct 6th

Information Security Management Training (CISMP)
London: Foundation
Starts Dec. 1st

Training/Update/Events
Update: Oct 19th
DP Regulation: Sept 28th
PIA: Sept 23rd
DP Audit: Sept 24th

Amberhawk

« Privacy and the media: Daily Mail knowingly publishes inaccurate personal data in order to undermine privacy injunction | Main | Personal data and DNA retention: U turn ahoy with Freedoms Bill? »

13/06/2011

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Note added by CP:

I understand from reliable sources that the PNR Directive does not apply to charter flights (as used by holiday companies) - whioh is very surprising, as it undermines the security case for the PNR Directive.

Question:

If the new EU-US PNR agreement obliges airline carriers to hand over 40 fields of PNR data, then effectively the airline carriers are being obliged to collect these 40 pieces of data.

What if one of these pieces of data is in breach of the 1995 data protection directive, say, on the grounds of revealing an individual's ethnicity or sexual orientation?

Are the airlines then in an impossible legal position? Isn't this a conflict of law?

The comments to this entry are closed.

All materials on this website are the copyright of Amberhawk Training Limited, except where otherwise stated. If you want to use the information on the blog, all we ask is that you do so in an attributable manner.