BrochuresCartoon

COURSES (ISEB/BCS)
follow link for detail

Data Protection Training

London
Starts April 29th

Leeds
Starts May 1st

London
Starts July 15th

FOI Training
Leeds
Starts June 2nd

Information Security Management Training (CISMP)
London
Starts June 23rd

Training/Update/Events
Update: May 12th
EU Regulation: April 9th
PIA: April 14th
DP Audit: April 15th

Amberhawk

« Privacy and the media: Daily Mail knowingly publishes inaccurate personal data in order to undermine privacy injunction | Main | Personal data and DNA retention: U turn ahoy with Freedoms Bill? »

13/06/2011

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a0115709c6f9d970b014e891ba8b1970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Analysis of proposed PNR Directive exposes absent or minimal data protection and privacy safeguards:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Note added by CP:

I understand from reliable sources that the PNR Directive does not apply to charter flights (as used by holiday companies) - whioh is very surprising, as it undermines the security case for the PNR Directive.

Question:

If the new EU-US PNR agreement obliges airline carriers to hand over 40 fields of PNR data, then effectively the airline carriers are being obliged to collect these 40 pieces of data.

What if one of these pieces of data is in breach of the 1995 data protection directive, say, on the grounds of revealing an individual's ethnicity or sexual orientation?

Are the airlines then in an impossible legal position? Isn't this a conflict of law?

The comments to this entry are closed.

All materials on this website are the copyright of Amberhawk Training Limited, except where otherwise stated. If you want to use the information on the blog, all we ask is that you do so in an attributable manner.