BrochuresCartoon

Amberhawk
COURSES (BCS/ISEB)
follow link for detail

Data Protection Training

Edinburgh: Foundation
3, 4 & 5 Oct

London: Practitioner
Starts Nov 13

FOI Training
London: Practitioner
Starts Oct 11

Information Security Management Training (CISMP)
London: Foundation
Starts Nov 27

Training/Update/Events
Update: Nov 20
GDPR: Sept 12 & Oct 6
PIA: Dec 12
DP Audit: Dec 14

Amberhawk

« Should the European Data Protection Supervisor resign? | Main | Information Commissioner should enforce Article 8 privacy rights »

16/04/2010

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Well, it ignores the (rather important) other definitions of data in the precedings subsections. The email in question would - surely - have fallen under s(1)(1)(a) and/or (b).

The "accessible record" provision is arguably a red herring as well - as this only applies to health/education/ public authority records.

Has Eady J fallen into the trap of assuming all five sub-sections must appply for the definition to bite?

Is it failure to consider the other elements of the definition? An email is information which is being processed by means of equipment operating automatically in response to instructions given for that purpose.

The fact that it is an email automatically means that it was part of a relevant filing system i.e. the email system itself. As for being part of an accessible record, the email IS the accessible record.

The comments to this entry are closed.

All materials on this website are the copyright of Amberhawk Training Limited, except where otherwise stated. If you want to use the information on the blog, all we ask is that you do so in an attributable manner.